The four-day school week has upsides and downsides. How do we weigh them?
Eco Child’s Play (ECP) brings an authoritative perspective to the recent move toward four-day school weeks, which have largely been the result of high fuel prices.
“As a parent and a teacher, I like this idea in order to give families personal time. As an environmentalist, it makes sense to cut down on energy use and transportation costs with such an alternative schedule.”
Unfortunately, this means longer school days, and parents can rarely change their work schedules. Which means paying for some type of daycare.
“A four day a week calendar means longer days for students to meet these minimum requirements. For the littlest ones, this is a concern from a developmental perspective. For oldest ones, the long day means not much is accomplished during the last hour of the day when fatigue and boredom set in.”
The final note on homeschooling being the “most energy efficient way to educate your child” shows where the author is coming from. For us, that’s akin to going with a horse and carriage to save on gas. It’s an entirely different debate than the four-day school week. But let’s just say that when you look at the types of families that homeschool, they tend to inhabit the fridges of society on either extreme.